![]() ![]() My results and some tables suggested that I could get the entire subject into focus in 4-5 focus increments. I then looked at depth of field previews to see what kind of depth I was getting at f/8. I used at 60mm f/2.8D micro-Nikkor set to f/8, mounted on my D3s affixed to an ultra-solid super-heavy studio tripod with heavy-duty head and no column extension.entirely eliminating camera stability and mounting issues from the equation. ![]() I didn't realize this until I did another very careful test shoot of my Nikon FM3a on a table. It turns out that I was wrong about being wrong, the problem was Photoshop itself. I thought that I must be doing something wrong with my procedures, that my focus increments were not small enough, etc. I have used the auto-panorama stitching function before in Photoshop CS6, with absolutely wonderful results, but the results this time were quite bad in almost every case.bugs, flowers, etc., all came out with blurry fringes interlaced through the image. ![]() So I've been doing more focus-stacked macro in recent months, and I have been blindly trusting and following the auto-blending feature in Photoshop (e.g., File>Automate>Photomerge, Select Files, Align Layers, and then Edit>Auto-Blend Layers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |